Volatility Is Log-Normal—But Not for the Reason You Think
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Embodied Cognition is Not What you Think it is
The most exciting hypothesis in cognitive science right now is the theory that cognition is embodied. Like all good ideas in cognitive science, however, embodiment immediately came to mean six different things. The most common definitions involve the straight-forward claim that "states of the body modify states of the mind." However, the implications of embodiment are actually much more radical...
متن کاملPavlovian conditioning. It's not what you think it is.
Current thinking about Pavlovian conditioning differs substantially from that of 20 years ago. Yet the changes that have taken place remain poorly appreciated by psychologists generally. Traditional descriptions of conditioning as the acquired ability of one stimulus to evoke the original response to another because of their pairing are shown to be inadequate. They fail to characterize adequate...
متن کاملTrait anxiety: it's not what you think it is.
Trait anxiety began as a psychodynamic concept, poorly tied to observables, and requiring Freudian defense mechanisms to explain recurrent anxiety episodes. Spielberger's thoughtful efforts improved the concept, but some important limitations remained. Lilienfeld, Turner, and Jacob (1989, 1993, 1996) uncritically accepted Spielberger's work on trait anxiety and asserted that it is the standard ...
متن کاملWhat you see is what you think--or is it?
Frizzled receptors in Drosophila. Science 288, 1825–1828 12 Willnow, T.E. et al. (1999) Lipoprotein receptors: new roles for ancient proteins. Nat. Cell Biol. 1, E157–E162 13 Trommsdorff, M. et al. (1999) Reeler/Disabled-like disruption of neuronal migration in knockout mice lacking the VLDL receptor and ApoE receptor 2. Cell 97, 689–701 14 Wehrli, M. et al. (2000) arrow encodes an LDL-receptor...
متن کاملEmotional Eating Is Not What You Think It Is and Emotional Eating Scales Do Not Measure What You Think They Measure
In eating research, it is common practice to group people into different eater types, such as emotional, external and restrained eaters. This categorization is generally based on scores on self-report questionnaires. However, recent studies have started to raise questions about the validity of such questionnaires. In the realm of emotional eating, a considerable number of studies, both in the l...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Risks
سال: 2018
ISSN: 2227-9091
DOI: 10.3390/risks6020046